News Ticker

A 25th anniversary worth forgetting and overloaded landfills…

25 years ago this week, the Exxon Valdez struck a reef in the pristine marine habitat of Prince William Sound.

The tanker spewed approx. 11 million gallons of crude oil into the clean, clear waters. So much for pristine.

Today, Exxon Mobile touts the comeback of the bay – but not so fast. A scientist for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (as quoted by the McClatchy Washington Bureau) said “I think the big surprise for all of us who have worked on this thing for the last 25 years has been the continued presence of relatively fresh oil.”

Indeed, despite the glowing remarks on recovery by Exxon Mobile, what looks recovered is anything but; pockets of oil are still found a few inches below the shoreline. A committee deems sockeye and pink salmon to be recovered but other species – otters, herring (which showed evidence of lesions related to the oil) and killer whales – are yet at pre-spill levels.

The “spill is not over,” said another scientist. “The damage persists in quite remarkable ways.” And we persist in drilling in Alaska and possibly shoving Canadian oil slurry through a high pressure pipeline just feet above the Ogallala Aqufier through my beloved Sand Hills in Nebraska?


This is not good news: according to the Environmental Protection Agency and based on research by the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), the average total waste for a newly constructed 3,000 sq. ft. home is estimated, incredibly, to be at least 13,000 lbs. That’s more than 4 lbs. per sq. ft. And we know where most of that waste winds up.

The EPA reports 36 percent of all material in 1,900 U.S. landfills derives from construction/demolition/renovation. I know that there are costs and time related to recycling, and some industries (steel, for example) encourage high recovery rates. As resources dwindle and, hopefully, recycling technology ramps up, we can, and ought to, do better.

Is this renovation waste from my development destined for recycling or the landfill? My guess is the latter.

Is this renovation waste from my development destined for recycling or the landfill? My guess is the latter.

My development is a microcosm of what is discarded and hauled away. Workers have been replacing the facia on our brownstones. Several loads have been carted away and it’s doubtful – and I don’t know this for certain – the destination is a recycling facility.

It makes my efforts paltry by comparison. Rather than my deeds as a drop in the bucket to reduce waste, it’s more like a molecule in a bucket.

About Dave Bradley (264 Articles)
I'm the one behind two totally unrelated blogs; the first on 17 years of writing weekly letters to my kids (plus other recipients), the other on my localized environmental responsibility ( I'm a writer by trade and both endeavors are accepted practice for me. As for the letters, my adult children Ellen and Reid may have seen these single pagers as corny at one point, but it's accepted practice for them, too, to find something in their mailbox other than bills and junk mail. Email and texting don't do a lot for me for a lot of different reasons. Snail mail has its place in the communicative world and so as long as they keep selling stamps, I'm buying. As for and the environment, I advocate what citizens can do themselves to take a direct hand in their neighborhood environment. But Pick Up Your Path is also a general environmental blog. It may be largely about litter and trash, but both of those are just one element of the total environmental picture.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: